Amid the prevailing doom and gloom over the worsening cost-of-living crisis, the administration has offered news that could be encouraging. According to a press release on the fifth meeting of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on the Ministry of Home Affairs, held on October 15, official statistics “indicated a notable improvement” in the country’s law-and-order situation. The press release has also added that committee members “expressed satisfaction” with the reported improvement. Isn’t it a wonderful relief to know, from these statements, that we are now better protected against the threat of random crime? The situation has apparently improved to such an extent that our elected representatives are satisfied. Could it mean that anyone can now venture out onto the streets without having to worry about being mugged, or that no one would turn up at our homes or offices demanding money in the name of donations or protection? Should parents rest assured that gang members will not...
Terming the government’s latest initiative to amend the Cyber Safety Act “ominous,” Mahfuz Anam, editor of this paper, wrote in his September 25 column that “there is no way that media can be protected under the draft cyber protection law.” He proposed “a separate cyber law for the media, or at least a separate set of rules and guidelines” that would prevent cybercrime without hampering freedom of speech, expression and publication. His suggestion echoes, in part, recommendations made by the Media Reform Commission (MRC) under the interim government. It is therefore worth revisiting those recommendations, particularly the proposed reforms aimed at protecting journalism while addressing the growing threats posed by disinformation and “fake news.” The MRC’s proposals broadly resemble rules and regulations already being implemented in many European countries and the UK. The proposed amendments to the cyber law appear to be a knee-jerk response to the threat of instability fuelled by rumo...