সরাসরি প্রধান সামগ্রীতে চলে যান

Can we trust the EC at all?

 Events leading to the schedule announcement of our 12th parliamentary election appear to have eerily similar to those before the  previous two much discredited and disputed elections. This time apart from serious disagreements among the most potent challengers centering  the election management process, the Election Commission’s consistently inconsistent statements and decisions show it lacks the courage and capacity to act decisively and independently. Otherwise, chief election commissioner Kazi Habibul Awal’s address to the nation would not have been full of contradictions. 

CEC Awal admitted that “the EC has been noticing differences among the political leadership regarding the polls, particularly on the issue of the institutional system of elections,” and that “consensus and solutions are needed,’ but announced the voting schedule without any resolution of the disputes. He then expects the nation to trust him when he said,  “We believe the upcoming polls will be free and fair, impartial, participatory, and peaceful.” 

He said, for a free, fair, inclusive, and festive election, there is a need for a conducive political environment, but leaves the responsibility for creating it on the parties entangled in an existential fight. He again contradicted himself when he said “- if conflict and violence take place due to differences, instability can be created, which will have a negative impact on the election process,” but in the same breath urged the people ‘to go to polling centres in festivity and exercise their voting rights freely, keeping aside all concerns, anxieties, and discomforts.’ The CEC then reminded the nation that “meaningful competition is an essential element of an election,” but didn’t explain how the next election could be meaningfully competitive without participation of the ruling party’s main challenger and several other political parties.   

Such inconsistencies are nothing new. The EC has repeatedly said one thing and did something other than that, if not the opposite. A more disturbing trend has also emerged, in which we see the EC secretary cancelling out the CEC’s observations. The most recent one is the secretary Md Jahangir Alam’s assertion a week ago that a conducive environment to announce the schedule of the next general election exists,’ though the CEC in his address to the nation decried its absence and urged all parties to reach a consensus. One may wonder whether the CEC would exercise his authority over the administration and replace the secretary who   is clearly out of line. Former election commissioner, late Mahbub Talukder’s book Nirbachonnama bears the testimony of how the EC secretariat served its political masters instead of the constitutional body.

Other things which have shown its inability and partisan behaviour towards the ruling party include its failure to deal with gross irregularities in local government and parliamentary by-elections, granting registration to two unknown and dubious parties, declining registrations to a number of well-known parties on shallow grounds, and entertaining discredited election observers associated with the ruling party who brought in fake foreign observers and enlisting them as local poll monitors despite earlier rejection.  These events suggest the EC is either giving in to pressures from some powerful quarters, or it does not have the required skills and independence to regulate these crucial elements of a genuine election.        

Ignoring substantial opposition to the holding of a one-sided election, the EC has argued that it has a constitutional obligation to hold the election in time. However, it has conveniently forgotten that it also has a constitutional obligation “to ensure effective participation of the people” (Article 11 in Part II of the constitution, under the title ‘Fundamental Principles of the State Policy’). Footnotes in the latest updated version of the constitution available on the official website of the Law Ministry reminds us that the part about “effective participation of the people” was omitted by the fourth amendment and again inserted ( following a national consensus to revert to a parliamentary system) by the 12th amendment in 1991. Should we be sacrificing effective participation of the people in the name of constitutionalism, albeit, which has been amended (by the 15th amendment) allegedly in an unconstitutional manner? 

Effective participation of the people is not only a national requirement, but an international one too. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted in 1948 states, “The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.”

On November 16, 2023, the global body representing parliamentarians of the world, the Inter-Parliamentary Union, IPU published a new tool called the Indicators for Democratic Parliaments, which offers a new approach to measuring parliamentary capacity, resilience and performance. It devised 25 indicators to evaluate parliament’s own strengths and weaknesses and one of those indicators is electoral integrity. In judging the electoral integrity it sets the criteria as such: “In practice, elections take place regularly. A significant proportion of citizens participate in these elections. Elections are competitive and citizens’ fundamental rights are respected before, during and after election day.” 

Rescheduling the national election is neither impossible nor without precedence. It was rescheduled, though by seven days only, in the not too distant past, in 2018. If parties can agree on the way forward, buying some additional time for holding the election is also possible, as counting of 90 days can begin afresh if parliament is dissolved. It is true that the history of dialogue between the two arch rivals - Awami League and BNP - is an unhappy one, but there were exceptions, too, such as the 1991 amendment for returning to the parliamentary form of government. 

It may sound superstitious. But, the day fixed for voting is a Sunday, the same day of the week like the last two sham elections - January 5, 2014 and December 30, 2018 - were held on. The last time people in Bangladesh freely voted was not a Sunday, but  on a Monday. We need a genuine election, not another sham one.  

(Published in The Daily Star on November 19, 2023.)


মন্তব্যসমূহ

এই ব্লগটি থেকে জনপ্রিয় পোস্টগুলি

Bangladesh is vexed by and wary of Modi’s unstinting support to Sheikh Hasina

In the run-up to Bangladesh’s general election in January 2014, New Delhi took the unusual step of sending a top diplomat from its external affairs ministry to Dhaka to persuade General Hussain Muhammaed Ershad, the country’s former military ruler, to participate in the polls. Big questions had been raised over the fairness of the election. The incumbent government was led by Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League, and the leader of the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) had been placed under virtual house arrest, with police and roadblocks around her house in Dhaka. The BNP and other opposition parties were threatening to boycott the election. Ershad, the head of the Jatiya Party, was perceived as a potential kingmaker, able to bring to power whichever of Bangladesh’s two main parties he supported, but he was also threatening to withdraw from the election.  After a decade of Modi’s reign in India, people in Bangladesh are angry at their government cosying up to a Hindutva regime ...

অরাজনৈতিক আন্দোলনের করুণ রাজনৈতিক মূল্য

কোটা সংস্কারের দাবিতে সাধারণ ছাত্র–ছাত্রীদের আন্দোলনে  কদিন ধরে যা ঘটে চলেছে, তা যেমন বেদনাদায়ক, তেমনই নিন্দনীয় ও ক্ষোভের কারণ। আন্দোলনকারী শিক্ষার্থীদের শিক্ষা দিতে ক্ষমতাসীন সরকারের সমর্থক এবং আইনশৃঙ্খলা রক্ষাবাহিনীর হাতে একইদিনে দেশের তিন জায়গায় ছয়জনের প্রাণহানির ঘটনা স্বাধীন বাংলাদেশে বিরল।  এবার আরও যেসব ঘটনা আমাদের স্তম্ভিত করেছে, অভিভাবকদের চোখ অশ্রুসিক্ত করেছে, এসব মৃত্যুর পরও সরকারের রাজনৈতিক দম্ভ বজায় রাখার চেষ্টা, যা আরও প্রাণহানির কারণ হয়েছে। ছয়জন তরুণের প্রাণ বিসর্জনের পরও কোটা সংস্কারের দাবিতে সরকার ”নীতিগতভাবে একমত” – একথাটি বলে  আলোচনায় না ডেকে সময়ক্ষেপণ করেছে। আইনমন্ত্রী কথাটি যখন বললেন, তার আগেই আরও জীবন গেল, শত শত মানুষ আহত হলো, দেশের সম্পদ নষ্ট হলো। রাজনৈতিক গরিমা ছাড়া এর আর কোনো কারণ আছে কি? ছাত্রলীগ পরিচয়ে অন্ত্রধারীদের তান্ডব, পুলিশের চরম নিষ্ঠুরতা এবং ঢাকা বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়সহ বিভিন্ন প্রতিষ্ঠানে ছাত্রীদের গড়পরতা মারধর ও লাঞ্চিত করার যে দৃশ্যগুলো গণমাধ্যমে প্রকাশ পেয়েছে, তা কোনো অভিভাবকের পক্ষেই ভোলা সম্ভব নয়। এসব ঘটনার বিবরণ উদ্ধৃত না করে শুধু নিষ্ঠুর ...

আনুপাতিক প্রতিনিধিত্বে স্বৈরশাসকের ফেরা সহজ

  গণতন্ত্রে উত্তরণে ব্যর্থতা ও স্বৈরতন্ত্রের নিকৃষ্টতম রুপ প্রত্যক্ষ করার পর অর্ন্তবর্তী সরকারের মেয়াদকালে যে সব বিষয়ে সংস্কারের আলোপ চলছে, তার মধ্যে অন্যতম হচ্ছে নির্বাচনব্যবস্থা। এরশাদের সামরিক স্বৈরাচারের পতনের পর নির্বাচনকে গণতন্ত্র চর্চার মাধ্যম হিসাবে যেভাবে প্রতিষ্ঠার কথা ছিল, তা থেকে প্রধান দুই দলই বিচ্যূত হয়েছিল। পরিণতিতে নির্বাচন শুধু ক্ষমতা দখলের হিংসাত্মক খেলায় পরিণত হয় এবং শেষ পর্যন্ত শেখ হাসিনার আওয়ামী লীগ সাধারণ মানুষের ভোটের অধিকার হরণ করে নির্বাচনকে নানা রকম প্রহসনে পরিণত করে।  এই সমস্যার এক অতি সরলীকৃত সমাধান হিসাবে বলা হচ্ছে, দ্বিদলীয় রাজনীতির বৃত্ত থেকে বেরিয়ে দেশে সত্যিকার বহুদলীয় গণতন্ত্র প্রতিষ্ঠা করতে হবে। আর বহুদলীয় গণতন্ত্রের জন্য নির্বাচনব্যবস্থায় আনুপাতিক প্রতিনিধিত্বের ধারণাকে একমাত্র বা চূড়ান্ত সমাধান হিসাবে তুলে ধরা হচ্ছে।  সংখ্যানুপাতিক বা আনুপাতিক প্রতিনিধিত্ব পদ্ধতির নির্বাচনে একটি দল যত শতাংশ ভোট পাবে, সে অনুপাতে তারা সংসদের আসন পাবে। এ আনুপাতিক পদ্ধতিতে প্রার্থীদের নাম দল আগাম ঘোষণা করতেও পারে, আবার না–ও পারে। নাম প্রকাশ করা হলে সেটা হব...