সরাসরি প্রধান সামগ্রীতে চলে যান

When even judicial exoneration can’t keep journalists safe

Another day, another attack on the press in Bangladesh. Unfortunately, this latest attack was brutal and the target was a journalist working far away from Dhaka, the capital, which meant he had little or no protection and institutional support for doing the most difficult job of holding the powerful accountable. The horrific death Golam Rabbani Nadim met with last week in Jamalpur’s Bakshiganj upazila was the  result of merciless beating by some musclemen allegedly on the orders of the local union parishad chairman Mahmudul Alam. 


Nadim was attacked the very day he learnt that a court had exonerated him from defamation charges brought under the most dreaded Digital Security Act (DSA) by chairman Mahmudul Alam for publishing a story about the latter’s alleged bigamy. In many conservative societies,  bigamy is considered a crime - or at the least moral degradation. UP chairmen are entrusted with the responsibility of issuing character certificates to residents within their jurisdictions as and when they are required. Mahmudul is also the general secretary of Awami Leagu’s Sadhupara union unit in Jamalpur, for which he enjoys political clout over local administration.  


Who could have thought that exoneration from the DSA charges would ultimately exonerate him from journalism, a profession he loved and dedicated to? As most of the mofussil correspondents get very little financial compensation from their employers, they need to top up their incomes by taking jobs in  two or more media houses. Nadim, too, had been working tirelessly for Bangla tabloid the Daily Manab Zamin, television channel Ekattor TV,  and news portal Banglanews24.com. 


A short clip of CCTV footage showing him being pulled down from his motorbike and accounts given by reliable eyewitnesses make one thing clear: he was killed in an ambush that bears hallmarks of a premeditated murder. In the footage, soon after he fell off his bike, the  attackers are directed to drag him out of the CCTV range, as an attacker is heard ordering, "Drag him to the dark and beat him." 


It may seem a mere coincidence that just before the story of Nadim’s killing came to my notice, I finished a chat with another journalist, Golam Sarwar, who made headlines for his desperate plea for his life to be spared with repeated hysterical utterances like “Please don’t beat me” and “I will not make any news again” as soon as he regained consciousness after rescuers recovered him from beside a canal in the Sitakunda, Chattogram. Sarwar, executive editor of a local news portal ctnewsbd.com was abducted on October 29, 2020, taken to an unknown location blindfolded, and repeatedly beaten until he was left unconscious by the canal side in Sitakunda three days later. 


Though his life was spared, Sarwar’s  sufferings didn’t end. Several attempts were made to run him over in Chattogram, and two defamation cases - one civil claim for compensation and another criminal complaint - were lodged against him. Ultimately he fled abroad leaving his family behind, and struggling for survival since then by doing odd jobs.


Unfortunately, these attacks on journalists and media houses are not coincidental. While writing this article, another breaking news flashed on my laptop that said Assaduzzaman, a correspondent of Bangladesh Bulletin in Uzirpur in Barisal, got beaten by a local Jubo League member for reporting on the assault of a madrasa student by him. It seems that assaulting journalists has become quite  common in the current environment, and in most cases the culprits either belong to the ruling party or get blessings from its leaders and the administration. 


The International Press Institute (IPI)  has documented at least 72 press freedom threats or violations over the past year, which includes both legal and physical attacks against journalists. The IPI says, “its monitoring shows that a majority of these incidents and violations were committed by state authorities, which include law enforcement and judicial authorities, precisely the public officials and institutions that are responsible for safeguarding fundamental human rights and the rule of law”. There’s a common perception that attacking journalists is not a crime and it doesn’t risk any judicial consequence. Families of journalists killed rarely get justice. A glaring example is the investigating agencies’ failure to conclude an investigation into the double murder of journalist couple Sagar Sarwar and Meherun Runi in more than 11 years. 


The global impunity index for crimes against journalists, produced by the Committee to Protect Journalists, CPJ, a leading press rights group, which compiles records on prosecuting the murderers of journalists, regularly placed Bangladesh among the worst 10 nations until 2021. Though Bangladesh dropped off in 2022 for the first time since CPJ started the index in 2008, it said the fall ‘does not mean that the press freedom or journalist safety environment has improved’. It added that the single notch drop was due to the numbers of  unsolved murders in the index period being less than five, which was a  requirement for inclusion in the report. 


Physical attacks on journalists, random misuse of the DSA, and threats in the form of unofficial advisories to media houses have seriously damaged press freedom in Bangladesh. Despite admission by our ministers of misuse of the DSA to silence criticism, the government continues to refuse suspension of this much discredited and criticised law as prescribed by the UN human rights chief. The law minister’s fresh  promise that the DSA will be amended in September, sans two most crucial provisions that the UN experts have flagged for abolition, is being viewed by many, including Western diplomats, as an attempt to keep tighter control on the media for taking propaganda advantage in the run-up to the national election. 


The killing of Golam Rabbani Nadim after his exoneration from the DSA clasp and the forced exile of Golam Sarwar ironically show that until and unless democracy is restored in the country, there won't be any accountability and press freedom. Even self-censorship and judicial exoneration may not be enough to ensure physical safety of journalists.   


(Published in The Daily Star, on June 19, 2023)

 







মন্তব্যসমূহ

এই ব্লগটি থেকে জনপ্রিয় পোস্টগুলি

Bangladesh is vexed by and wary of Modi’s unstinting support to Sheikh Hasina

In the run-up to Bangladesh’s general election in January 2014, New Delhi took the unusual step of sending a top diplomat from its external affairs ministry to Dhaka to persuade General Hussain Muhammaed Ershad, the country’s former military ruler, to participate in the polls. Big questions had been raised over the fairness of the election. The incumbent government was led by Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League, and the leader of the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) had been placed under virtual house arrest, with police and roadblocks around her house in Dhaka. The BNP and other opposition parties were threatening to boycott the election. Ershad, the head of the Jatiya Party, was perceived as a potential kingmaker, able to bring to power whichever of Bangladesh’s two main parties he supported, but he was also threatening to withdraw from the election.  After a decade of Modi’s reign in India, people in Bangladesh are angry at their government cosying up to a Hindutva regime ...

অরাজনৈতিক আন্দোলনের করুণ রাজনৈতিক মূল্য

কোটা সংস্কারের দাবিতে সাধারণ ছাত্র–ছাত্রীদের আন্দোলনে  কদিন ধরে যা ঘটে চলেছে, তা যেমন বেদনাদায়ক, তেমনই নিন্দনীয় ও ক্ষোভের কারণ। আন্দোলনকারী শিক্ষার্থীদের শিক্ষা দিতে ক্ষমতাসীন সরকারের সমর্থক এবং আইনশৃঙ্খলা রক্ষাবাহিনীর হাতে একইদিনে দেশের তিন জায়গায় ছয়জনের প্রাণহানির ঘটনা স্বাধীন বাংলাদেশে বিরল।  এবার আরও যেসব ঘটনা আমাদের স্তম্ভিত করেছে, অভিভাবকদের চোখ অশ্রুসিক্ত করেছে, এসব মৃত্যুর পরও সরকারের রাজনৈতিক দম্ভ বজায় রাখার চেষ্টা, যা আরও প্রাণহানির কারণ হয়েছে। ছয়জন তরুণের প্রাণ বিসর্জনের পরও কোটা সংস্কারের দাবিতে সরকার ”নীতিগতভাবে একমত” – একথাটি বলে  আলোচনায় না ডেকে সময়ক্ষেপণ করেছে। আইনমন্ত্রী কথাটি যখন বললেন, তার আগেই আরও জীবন গেল, শত শত মানুষ আহত হলো, দেশের সম্পদ নষ্ট হলো। রাজনৈতিক গরিমা ছাড়া এর আর কোনো কারণ আছে কি? ছাত্রলীগ পরিচয়ে অন্ত্রধারীদের তান্ডব, পুলিশের চরম নিষ্ঠুরতা এবং ঢাকা বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়সহ বিভিন্ন প্রতিষ্ঠানে ছাত্রীদের গড়পরতা মারধর ও লাঞ্চিত করার যে দৃশ্যগুলো গণমাধ্যমে প্রকাশ পেয়েছে, তা কোনো অভিভাবকের পক্ষেই ভোলা সম্ভব নয়। এসব ঘটনার বিবরণ উদ্ধৃত না করে শুধু নিষ্ঠুর ...

আনুপাতিক প্রতিনিধিত্বে স্বৈরশাসকের ফেরা সহজ

  গণতন্ত্রে উত্তরণে ব্যর্থতা ও স্বৈরতন্ত্রের নিকৃষ্টতম রুপ প্রত্যক্ষ করার পর অর্ন্তবর্তী সরকারের মেয়াদকালে যে সব বিষয়ে সংস্কারের আলোপ চলছে, তার মধ্যে অন্যতম হচ্ছে নির্বাচনব্যবস্থা। এরশাদের সামরিক স্বৈরাচারের পতনের পর নির্বাচনকে গণতন্ত্র চর্চার মাধ্যম হিসাবে যেভাবে প্রতিষ্ঠার কথা ছিল, তা থেকে প্রধান দুই দলই বিচ্যূত হয়েছিল। পরিণতিতে নির্বাচন শুধু ক্ষমতা দখলের হিংসাত্মক খেলায় পরিণত হয় এবং শেষ পর্যন্ত শেখ হাসিনার আওয়ামী লীগ সাধারণ মানুষের ভোটের অধিকার হরণ করে নির্বাচনকে নানা রকম প্রহসনে পরিণত করে।  এই সমস্যার এক অতি সরলীকৃত সমাধান হিসাবে বলা হচ্ছে, দ্বিদলীয় রাজনীতির বৃত্ত থেকে বেরিয়ে দেশে সত্যিকার বহুদলীয় গণতন্ত্র প্রতিষ্ঠা করতে হবে। আর বহুদলীয় গণতন্ত্রের জন্য নির্বাচনব্যবস্থায় আনুপাতিক প্রতিনিধিত্বের ধারণাকে একমাত্র বা চূড়ান্ত সমাধান হিসাবে তুলে ধরা হচ্ছে।  সংখ্যানুপাতিক বা আনুপাতিক প্রতিনিধিত্ব পদ্ধতির নির্বাচনে একটি দল যত শতাংশ ভোট পাবে, সে অনুপাতে তারা সংসদের আসন পাবে। এ আনুপাতিক পদ্ধতিতে প্রার্থীদের নাম দল আগাম ঘোষণা করতেও পারে, আবার না–ও পারে। নাম প্রকাশ করা হলে সেটা হব...