সরাসরি প্রধান সামগ্রীতে চলে যান

‘Bloodstained’ UP elections and the CEC’s alternative truth

Video footage and reports have been emerging daily on both traditional and social media exposing how violent and intimidating our elections have become. It has been going on throughout the country and in all the phases of local government elections—mostly union parishads (UPs) but in a few municipalities too. Death counts from these acts of violence are between 39 and 50, depending on official and unofficial statistics. The Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Khan Mohammad Nurul Huda, however, said "the elections were not violent and there were only a few incidents of violence", whereas his fellow Commissioner Mahbub Talukder termed it as "bloodstained". 

A closer scrutiny of the facts shows that during the first two phases of UP elections, at least 200 chairmen were elected uncontested, which is suggestive of intimidation by candidates favoured by local administration in order to force likely contenders to quit the race. Such administrative favours, though unlawful and undesired, are quite rampant due to the pressures applied by the ruling party's local leadership, which in most cases involve MPs. Hence, we have seen the High Court's intervention and follow-up queries to ensure a few MPs leave their constituencies during this period. Several videos have gone viral, showing members of the ruling party asking voters that they would have to show their votes before putting them in the ballot box. Post-result recovery of ballots—more than enough to overturn the outcome in Tangail and Cox's Bazar—were published in the media, but the aggrieved parties were simply told to go to election tribunals. The third phase of UP polling, scheduled for today, is unlikely to be any different.

The unfortunate loss of lives during these elections meant that, on an average, at least one person had to die for every 25 UPs. Had the CEC and his fellow commissioners had some decency, they would have apologised to the families of each of these victims and initiated appropriate legal actions against the perpetrators. Instead, the CEC has engaged himself in putting out alternative narratives, devoid of facts. The current Election Commission's records in poll management and conduct—with the exception of one commissioner, Mahbub Talukder—are similar to the preceding EC led by Kazi Rakibuddin Ahmed. Those similarities are not only in their failures to make elections participatory, competitive and fair, but in callous behaviours too, including disregard for human lives.

These are quite a few symptoms of the total collapse of the electoral system and its supervisory institution. Unfortunately, many among us are more concerned about symptoms instead of the cause of the ailment. Some people have called for doing away with contests based on party nominations, as if the EC is not at fault. But, ground reports show that most of these contests are between various factions of the ruling party. In some places, it's a battle between the local MP and upazila chairman or party executives. In a number of places, leaders of the student or youth wings are running against main party functionaries.

The reason for such desperation among factions is to get a share of the pie—cuts from development projects and government allocations for social support. Quite a few newspapers have reported that the number of so-called rebels from the ruling party account for more than one-third of the elected chairmen. In most of these places, election officials belonging to civil administration favour the strongest due to the power equation. Until and unless the Election Commission assumes its constitutional obligations honestly and sincerely, they will not be able to make the administration act with neutrality and according to law.

Primarily, the responsibility of the bloodshed and electoral farces lies with the EC. Despite having all necessary constitutional authority and power to hold free, fair and participatory elections, they have not delivered a single election in their nearly exhausted five-year term which people deemed credible. Mahbub Talukder's comment that UP "elections are now in ICU (Intensive Care Unit) and democracy is on life support as its side effect" is equally true for all the elections and by-elections held under the current EC and its immediate predecessor. It was aptly put by the chief of Shujan (Sushashoner Jannyo Nagorik), Badiul Alam Majumder, when he said at least people in our country had one day of democracy every five years when as a kingmaker they could vote, but that too was lost due to the failure of the EC.

Apart from the Election Commission, it is the government that shares the blame for causing so much harm to the electoral mechanism. Since scrapping the 13th amendment and abolishing the system of caretaker government, the ruling party Awami League has been gradually shifting towards authoritarianism. Dissent and criticism are no longer tolerated and politicisation of state institutions, including the civil administration, has made the functioning of a viable opposition almost impossible. As a result, whoever holds any ambition for a public office and political power and influence has little choice other than joining the Awami League. It explains why elections nowadays are an intra-party contest and frequently turn deadly. Creating and maintaining a peaceful electoral environment thus no longer remains a priority for the administration.

Historical data shows the worst record of electoral violence was in the UP elections of 2016, when a total of 145 lives were lost. But, the second worst record goes back to 1988 under the military rule of General Ershad, when 80 people were killed in union parishad elections. It, therefore, could be argued that violence in elections of the lowest tier of local government is more likely to be linked with lack of, or, weaker democracy; and not whether the contest was on the basis of party nominations and symbols.        

The first UP elections after Awami League's return to power, held in 2011, was managed by the Election Commission led by Shamsul Huda, when the opposition was much stronger despite the fact that their representation in parliament was much diminished. Those elections too were very competitive and unfortunately saw 10 lives lost, but no one questioned the integrity of the electoral process and the role of the commission.

In the past, violence in elections was largely meant to stifle political competition, but now it also disenfranchises the electorate. And, it is the result of the Election Commission's failure to stand up to the hegemonic pressure from the party in power. Without the restoration of the honour and integrity of this constitutional body, these farcical theatrics are simply a waste of national resources.

(Published in the Daily Star on 28 November, 2021.)

মন্তব্যসমূহ

এই ব্লগটি থেকে জনপ্রিয় পোস্টগুলি

Bangladesh is vexed by and wary of Modi’s unstinting support to Sheikh Hasina

In the run-up to Bangladesh’s general election in January 2014, New Delhi took the unusual step of sending a top diplomat from its external affairs ministry to Dhaka to persuade General Hussain Muhammaed Ershad, the country’s former military ruler, to participate in the polls. Big questions had been raised over the fairness of the election. The incumbent government was led by Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League, and the leader of the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) had been placed under virtual house arrest, with police and roadblocks around her house in Dhaka. The BNP and other opposition parties were threatening to boycott the election. Ershad, the head of the Jatiya Party, was perceived as a potential kingmaker, able to bring to power whichever of Bangladesh’s two main parties he supported, but he was also threatening to withdraw from the election.  After a decade of Modi’s reign in India, people in Bangladesh are angry at their government cosying up to a Hindutva regime ...

অরাজনৈতিক আন্দোলনের করুণ রাজনৈতিক মূল্য

কোটা সংস্কারের দাবিতে সাধারণ ছাত্র–ছাত্রীদের আন্দোলনে  কদিন ধরে যা ঘটে চলেছে, তা যেমন বেদনাদায়ক, তেমনই নিন্দনীয় ও ক্ষোভের কারণ। আন্দোলনকারী শিক্ষার্থীদের শিক্ষা দিতে ক্ষমতাসীন সরকারের সমর্থক এবং আইনশৃঙ্খলা রক্ষাবাহিনীর হাতে একইদিনে দেশের তিন জায়গায় ছয়জনের প্রাণহানির ঘটনা স্বাধীন বাংলাদেশে বিরল।  এবার আরও যেসব ঘটনা আমাদের স্তম্ভিত করেছে, অভিভাবকদের চোখ অশ্রুসিক্ত করেছে, এসব মৃত্যুর পরও সরকারের রাজনৈতিক দম্ভ বজায় রাখার চেষ্টা, যা আরও প্রাণহানির কারণ হয়েছে। ছয়জন তরুণের প্রাণ বিসর্জনের পরও কোটা সংস্কারের দাবিতে সরকার ”নীতিগতভাবে একমত” – একথাটি বলে  আলোচনায় না ডেকে সময়ক্ষেপণ করেছে। আইনমন্ত্রী কথাটি যখন বললেন, তার আগেই আরও জীবন গেল, শত শত মানুষ আহত হলো, দেশের সম্পদ নষ্ট হলো। রাজনৈতিক গরিমা ছাড়া এর আর কোনো কারণ আছে কি? ছাত্রলীগ পরিচয়ে অন্ত্রধারীদের তান্ডব, পুলিশের চরম নিষ্ঠুরতা এবং ঢাকা বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়সহ বিভিন্ন প্রতিষ্ঠানে ছাত্রীদের গড়পরতা মারধর ও লাঞ্চিত করার যে দৃশ্যগুলো গণমাধ্যমে প্রকাশ পেয়েছে, তা কোনো অভিভাবকের পক্ষেই ভোলা সম্ভব নয়। এসব ঘটনার বিবরণ উদ্ধৃত না করে শুধু নিষ্ঠুর ...

আনুপাতিক প্রতিনিধিত্বে স্বৈরশাসকের ফেরা সহজ

  গণতন্ত্রে উত্তরণে ব্যর্থতা ও স্বৈরতন্ত্রের নিকৃষ্টতম রুপ প্রত্যক্ষ করার পর অর্ন্তবর্তী সরকারের মেয়াদকালে যে সব বিষয়ে সংস্কারের আলোপ চলছে, তার মধ্যে অন্যতম হচ্ছে নির্বাচনব্যবস্থা। এরশাদের সামরিক স্বৈরাচারের পতনের পর নির্বাচনকে গণতন্ত্র চর্চার মাধ্যম হিসাবে যেভাবে প্রতিষ্ঠার কথা ছিল, তা থেকে প্রধান দুই দলই বিচ্যূত হয়েছিল। পরিণতিতে নির্বাচন শুধু ক্ষমতা দখলের হিংসাত্মক খেলায় পরিণত হয় এবং শেষ পর্যন্ত শেখ হাসিনার আওয়ামী লীগ সাধারণ মানুষের ভোটের অধিকার হরণ করে নির্বাচনকে নানা রকম প্রহসনে পরিণত করে।  এই সমস্যার এক অতি সরলীকৃত সমাধান হিসাবে বলা হচ্ছে, দ্বিদলীয় রাজনীতির বৃত্ত থেকে বেরিয়ে দেশে সত্যিকার বহুদলীয় গণতন্ত্র প্রতিষ্ঠা করতে হবে। আর বহুদলীয় গণতন্ত্রের জন্য নির্বাচনব্যবস্থায় আনুপাতিক প্রতিনিধিত্বের ধারণাকে একমাত্র বা চূড়ান্ত সমাধান হিসাবে তুলে ধরা হচ্ছে।  সংখ্যানুপাতিক বা আনুপাতিক প্রতিনিধিত্ব পদ্ধতির নির্বাচনে একটি দল যত শতাংশ ভোট পাবে, সে অনুপাতে তারা সংসদের আসন পাবে। এ আনুপাতিক পদ্ধতিতে প্রার্থীদের নাম দল আগাম ঘোষণা করতেও পারে, আবার না–ও পারে। নাম প্রকাশ করা হলে সেটা হব...