সরাসরি প্রধান সামগ্রীতে চলে যান

What the racism scandal of English cricket tells us

When Indian-born Muslim cricketer Nasser Hussain captained the England team, no one could have imagined that after nearly two decades, the game would be facing a storm of this magnitude and compel the wider society to confront one of the most sensitive issues: racism. Over the years, England's cricketers of South Asian origin, like Monty Panesar, Ravi Bopara, Moeen Ali and Adil Rashid, who have all shown their on-pitch talents, never talked about racism. But since cricketer Azeem Rafiq's revelation about his sufferings and pain, the issue of racism has now become a subject of much bigger debate around race relations, Islamophobia and division in Britain today. The racial abuses he was subjected to include repeatedly being called a "pa*i," and referred to by the name "Kevin," a dehumanising moniker for black and Asian players.

The racism scandal that engulfed the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) has finally made them acknowledge that racism and discrimination is a "blight" on their game and they "apologise unreservedly." The apology came after a crisis meeting of the board and representatives from the Professional Cricketers' Association, Marylebone Cricket Club, the National Counties Cricket Association, and the First Class and Recreational County Cricket network. It followed a hearing of the parliamentary select committee on Digital, Culture, Media and Sport on November 16, 2021, where former Yorkshire cricketer Azeem Rafiq alleged that English cricket was "institutionally racist." The select committee hearing, too, was held hurriedly amid weeks of turmoil over revelations by Rafiq about his harrowing experience at the Yorkshire County Club at subsequent cover-ups.

A joint statement issued after the meeting said: "Azeem Rafiq has shone a light on our game that has shocked, shamed and saddened us all." Making a commitment to publish a "tangible action plan," the statement said: "To Azeem and all those who have experienced any form of discrimination, we are truly sorry. Our sport did not welcome you, our game did not accept you as we should have done. We apologise unreservedly for the suffering you have faced."

Rafiq first spoke out in September 2020, prompting the club to open an investigation the following month. But according to the testimony given before the parliamentary select committee by the former chairman of the Yorkshire Club, Roger Hutton, though the investigation upheld seven of the 43 allegations made by Rafiq, the club's management decided against punishing anyone. It also refused to publish the full report of the investigation that led to further accusations of institutional racism in the club and in the wider arena of English cricket, as the ECB stayed away from intervening in the club's affairs.

The ensuing outrage was so widespread that the ECB's suspension of Yorkshire from hosting international matches at Headingley appeared to be an action too little too late. Sports Minister Nigel Huddleston issued a warning, saying that if the ECB does not "put its house in order" over racism, the UK government might take the "nuclear option" of creating an independent regulator.

Amid the racism scandal, the Independent Commission for Equity in Cricket (ICEC), on November 9, made an appeal to potential victims of racism and discrimination to come forward with evidence. Media reports suggest that more than 1,000 people have contacted the commission within less than a fortnight. Few other former players of Yorkshire academy, too, have come forward to speak about alleged racist abuse they suffered at the club. Similar allegations of racist behaviour have emerged at Essex county club, warranting more investigations, and the prospect of more to come looms large.

Some grim statistics, too, came to the fore, which the ECB needs to look into with urgency. In England, the British-Asian community accounts for 30 percent of recreational cricket at grassroots level, but only to see this drop to four percent at professional level. Another set of figures show that about a quarter of top-level players are members of the families of former cricketers, which critics say is reflective of elitism in the game, instead of talent.

Once again, businesses have shown extraordinary courage and stance against racism, which is similar to those actions taken during Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. Yorkshire Club's primary sponsor Emerald Publishing and Yorkshire Tea announced that they were ending their deals with the club. Leisure club operator David Lloyd said his business had chosen not to reinstate its partnership, and Tetley's beer said its sponsorship would not be extended beyond the end of the current contractual agreement. Yorkshire's kit supplier, global giant Nike, also announced that it would stop supplying kits. Losing so many sponsorships and the right to host international matches at its home ground, Headingley, forced the club management to step aside and welcome the new chairman from ethnic minority community.

Nasser Hussain, who currently works as a Sky Sports commentator, says that the problem is far more widespread than Yorkshire. In his Daily Mail column, he wrote: "[Racism] is prevalent throughout the game." Explaining the reasons for past silence, he wrote: "And it has not been picked up because it has become the norm. It's been a 'that's what we do' attitude and that has been allowed to fester for far too long. Those constant little digs and comments take their toll and the victims have just been forced to laugh it off because they have to fit in and conform."

The ongoing turmoil in English cricket over racism also reveals the helplessness of players in voicing their grievances against bullying, and the lack of accountability of their powerful bosses. We, in our country, can proudly say that we don't have any trace of racism, but can we claim that there is no bullying? Making players attend political campaigns or often subjecting them to public humiliation are not unheard of. And what about the accountability of cricketing bosses on issues like allegations of match-fixing in domestic leagues? Why does the national team's jersey carry sponsors' branding larger and more prominently than the national identity? Waiting for a whistle-blower is never a good idea for any organisation.

(Published in the Daily Star on 23 November, 2021.)

মন্তব্যসমূহ

এই ব্লগটি থেকে জনপ্রিয় পোস্টগুলি

Bangladesh is vexed by and wary of Modi’s unstinting support to Sheikh Hasina

In the run-up to Bangladesh’s general election in January 2014, New Delhi took the unusual step of sending a top diplomat from its external affairs ministry to Dhaka to persuade General Hussain Muhammaed Ershad, the country’s former military ruler, to participate in the polls. Big questions had been raised over the fairness of the election. The incumbent government was led by Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League, and the leader of the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) had been placed under virtual house arrest, with police and roadblocks around her house in Dhaka. The BNP and other opposition parties were threatening to boycott the election. Ershad, the head of the Jatiya Party, was perceived as a potential kingmaker, able to bring to power whichever of Bangladesh’s two main parties he supported, but he was also threatening to withdraw from the election.  After a decade of Modi’s reign in India, people in Bangladesh are angry at their government cosying up to a Hindutva regime in N

একটি জরিপ, নৈরাশ্য ও তত্ত্বাবধায়ক সরকারের প্রশ্ন

উন্নত গণতন্ত্রে সরকার , সরকারপ্রধান, ক্ষমতাসীন ও বিরোধী দল এবং বিভিন্ন বিতর্কিত ইস্যুতে প্রায়ই জনমত জরিপ করে বিভিন্ন প্রতিষ্ঠান। কখনো বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়, কখনো সংবাদমাধ্যম, আবার কখনো বেসরকারি বিভিন্ন প্রতিষ্ঠান এসব জরিপ করায়। বেশ কিছু পেশাদার জরিপকারী প্রতিষ্ঠানও আছে, যারা শুধু জরিপের কাজ করে। এসব জরিপ আমাদের গণমাধ্যমগুলোর অনলাইন ভোটের মতো নয়, যা অধিকাংশ ক্ষেত্রেই শুধু সেই ওয়েবসাইটের নিয়মিত ব্যবহারকারীদের মতামত ছাড়া আর কিছুই নয়। আমাদের দেশে গণতন্ত্রে প্রত্যাবর্তনের প্রায় দুই দশক বার্ষিক জরিপে রাজনীতির গতিপ্রকৃতির চমৎকার প্রতিফলন দেখা যেত। কিন্তু গণতন্ত্রের ক্ষয়সাধনের সঙ্গে সঙ্গে সেই চর্চা প্রায় বন্ধ হয়ে গেছে। ব্যবসায়িক প্রয়োজন ছাড়া অন্য কোনো বিষয়ে জরিপ করতে গেলে সরকারের সায় আছে কিনা সেটা দেখা হয়, নইলে পেশাদার বিশেষজ্ঞরা বা তাঁদের প্রতিষ্ঠানগুলো ওই দায়িত্ব নিতে চান না। কথা বলার ভয়ের মতো মতামত জানতে চাওয়াতেও এক ধরনের ভয়ের আসর পড়েছে। গণতন্ত্র প্রসারে কাজ করা যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের বেসরকারি প্রতিষ্ঠান ইন্টারন্যাশনাল রিপাবলিকান ইনস্টিটিউট, আইআরআই এ ক্ষেত্রে ব্যতিক্রম। তারা এখনো মাঝে মধ্যে স্পর্শকাতর রাজন

ভিসা নিষেধাজ্ঞা গুরুতর, সাংবাদিক নির্যাতন কী

একই দিনের দুটি সংবাদ শিরোনাম, ’৯ মাসে ২১৭ সাংবাদিক নির্যাতন ও হয়রানির শিকার: আইন ও সালিশ কেন্দ্র’ এবং ’পিটার হাসের বক্তব্য স্বাধীন সাংবাদিকতার ওপর চাপ, সমাবেশে সাংবাদিকনেতারা’। দুটো খবরই সাংবাদিকতা এবং সংবাদমাধ্যমের স্বাধীনতার বিষয়ে। তবে একটি খবর, যাতে আছে সেই সব সাংবাদিকদের কথা, যাঁরা পেশাগত দায়িত্ব পালনের জন্য আঘাতপ্রাপ্ত হয়ে শারীরিক ক্ষতি অথবা গ্রেপ্তার ও মামলার কারণে হয়রানির শিকার হয়েছেন; আর অন্যটিতে ভবিষ্যতে কোনো গণমাধ্যমকর্মী যুক্তরাষ্ট্র যেতে চাইলে ভিসা না পাওয়ার কারণে তিনি বা তাঁর যে সম্ভাব্য ক্ষতি হতে পারে, তা নিয়ে আশঙ্কা। সাংবাদিকদের নিপীড়ন–নির্যাতন ও হয়রানির বিষয়ে গবেষণার কাজ ও তা প্রকাশের দায়িত্ব পালন করেছে একটি মানবাধিকার সংগঠন। অন্যদিকে, যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের ভিসার দুশ্চিন্তায় প্রতিবাদী হয়েছেন সাংবাদিকদের অপেক্ষাকৃত নতুন একটি প্লাটফর্ম জাস্টিস ফর জার্নালিস্ট।  বেসরকারি মানবাধিকার সংগঠনগুলোর নিয়মিত কাজের একটি হচ্ছে বিভিন্ন নিপীড়ন–নির্যাতন ও হয়রানির মত অধিকার লংঘনের তথ্য সংগ্রহ করা এবং তারই অংশ হিসাবে অন্যতম ঝুঁকিপূর্ণ পেশা সাংবাদিকতার ওপর তাদের আলাদা মনোযোগ। তাদের প্রকাশিত হিসাব