সরাসরি প্রধান সামগ্রীতে চলে যান

UN rights chief’s visit: Conflicting expectations and a hope for positive change

The recent visit to Bangladesh by UN human rights chief Michelle Bachelet attracted quite a significant amount of interest among rights activists globally, as it came after her controversial trip to China in May. She went to China despite opposition from rights activists and the United States which had expressed concerns that she would not have unfettered access to people subjected to alleged torture and intimidations. Later, on June 15, she told the Human Rights Council that she was unable to meet the detained Uyghurs. Some of these activists expressed concerns that her Dhaka visit could be used by the government, who faces criticism for widespread abuses and repressive laws, in claiming that it had nothing to hide.  


Prior to her Dhaka trip, nine human rights organizations, including Human Rights Watch (HRW), issued a joint statement on August 10, urging the UN rights chief to publicly call for an immediate end to serious human rights violations, including torture and disappearances. They claimed that if the high commissioner failed to clearly condemn these abuses and seek reform, the ruling Awami League could use her silence to legitimise its abuses and undermine activists.” These groups alleged that, “hundreds of Bangladeshis have been forcibly disappeared, tortured, and killed since the government led by Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina first took office in 2009.” 


They have also appealed to the UN High Commissioner that she should encourage the Bangladesh government to create an independent commission of inquiry to investigate all allegations of enforced disappearances, torture, extrajudicial killings, and custodial deaths and offer the support of her office to form such a commission. The joint statement said, she should make clear to the government that ongoing security force abuses will jeopardise deployment of Bangladesh troops to UN peacekeeping operations. When the High Commissioner met representatives of civil society and victims’ families, they pressed her for a UN mechanism to investigate these allegations, as according to them, our judicial system has lost its independence and become politicised.   


It is well-known that about a dozen requests from special rapporteurs and experts from various UN mechanisms have been pending for years, as those visits are seen to be something akin to fact-finding missions. So, it was a curious development that the government was eager to host the outgoing High Commissioner Bachelet. Why did the government want such a visit? 


Foreign Secretary, Masud Bin Momen explained it well to Prothom Alo, 'Bangladesh is one of the candidates for the United Nations Human Rights Council membership election. Therefore, there is a need for discussion and communication at various levels of the council. Many have misconceptions and complaints about contemporary issues such as disappearances, extrajudicial killings and digital security laws. All the complaints about these things reported in the media are not correct. As a result, we hope that the High Commissioner will understand the situation better by talking to the law minister, the foreign minister and the home minister. If there is a violation of the rules in these matters, what measures we have taken, will be presented to her. From this point of view, we see this visit as an opportunity to explain our position”(August 14, 2022).

 


Expectations on the part of the government and the rights groups could not have been more contrasting. And the statement made by Ms Bachelet at the end of the visit  -perhaps the only public one - now makes it now clear whether or how much of those conflicting expectations have been met. Bachelet’s statement commends the government’s achievements in socioeconomic development, poverty eradication, increasing access to education and health, reducing women’s and children’s mortality, and increasing access to food, water and sanitation. But not once the nine-page statement mention Bangladesh as a democracy. Instead, it noted, “Democratic and civic space, as well as effective checks and balances and accountability are essential as Bangladesh aims for the next levels of development.” Perhaps the argument made by some civil society representatives that the government had lost its democratic credentials through disenfranchising its citizens during the last two parliamentary elections was too convincing. And it could be the reason that prompted her to call for national dialogue among political parties and others ahead of elections. 


The most important intervention, on her part, in the conflicting claims and counter claims on extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances and tortures, was her call for an impartial, independent and transparent investigation into the allegations and the support she offered from her office, the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (OHCHR) in this regard. Discarding ministers’ narratives on denying these grievous violations and as propaganda by political opponents, she said, “Various UN human rights mechanisms – including the UN Committee Against Torture, have been raising concerns for several years.” She also spoke about the involvement of the Rapid Action Battalion (Rab) in those alleged abuses and violations. Against the backdrop of US sanctions against Rab on the same charges, her concerns add further gravity on the issue. She also called for Inviting the UN Working Group on Enforced Disappearances to visit Bangladesh, arguing that it would also show a commitment to decisively address this issue. Her insistence that Bangladesh should ensure it has a robust system in place for the careful human rights screening of security personnel, is a reminder that it needs to think about the future of UN peacekeeping missions. . 


Michelle Bachelet’s disclosure that her office has put forward recommendations to the government for essential amendments to the Digital Security Act to remove barriers on freedom of expression and ensure international human rights standards and obligations means the government needs to act soon. She also reminded the government of the importance of working closely with civil society and the UN to ensure that the new draft data protection law and the OTT (over-the-top) Platform regulations meet international human rights standards.


Prior to her visit, BNP and families of missing persons demanded a UN investigation following the release of an investigative documentary on enforced disappearances by Sweden-based news portal Netra News, titled ``Secret Prisoners of Dhaka (Aynagharer Bondi)''. Though some ministers’ reactions suggest that the government has realised its diplomatic blunder, it could have been much worse had Bachelet agreed to the demand for initiating the OHCHR’s own investigation mechanism. Continuing denial may ultimately lead us to such an undesired end.


(Published in The Daily Star on August 21,2022)


















মন্তব্যসমূহ

এই ব্লগটি থেকে জনপ্রিয় পোস্টগুলি

Bangladesh is vexed by and wary of Modi’s unstinting support to Sheikh Hasina

In the run-up to Bangladesh’s general election in January 2014, New Delhi took the unusual step of sending a top diplomat from its external affairs ministry to Dhaka to persuade General Hussain Muhammaed Ershad, the country’s former military ruler, to participate in the polls. Big questions had been raised over the fairness of the election. The incumbent government was led by Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League, and the leader of the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) had been placed under virtual house arrest, with police and roadblocks around her house in Dhaka. The BNP and other opposition parties were threatening to boycott the election. Ershad, the head of the Jatiya Party, was perceived as a potential kingmaker, able to bring to power whichever of Bangladesh’s two main parties he supported, but he was also threatening to withdraw from the election.  After a decade of Modi’s reign in India, people in Bangladesh are angry at their government cosying up to a Hindutva regime in N

একটি জরিপ, নৈরাশ্য ও তত্ত্বাবধায়ক সরকারের প্রশ্ন

উন্নত গণতন্ত্রে সরকার , সরকারপ্রধান, ক্ষমতাসীন ও বিরোধী দল এবং বিভিন্ন বিতর্কিত ইস্যুতে প্রায়ই জনমত জরিপ করে বিভিন্ন প্রতিষ্ঠান। কখনো বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়, কখনো সংবাদমাধ্যম, আবার কখনো বেসরকারি বিভিন্ন প্রতিষ্ঠান এসব জরিপ করায়। বেশ কিছু পেশাদার জরিপকারী প্রতিষ্ঠানও আছে, যারা শুধু জরিপের কাজ করে। এসব জরিপ আমাদের গণমাধ্যমগুলোর অনলাইন ভোটের মতো নয়, যা অধিকাংশ ক্ষেত্রেই শুধু সেই ওয়েবসাইটের নিয়মিত ব্যবহারকারীদের মতামত ছাড়া আর কিছুই নয়। আমাদের দেশে গণতন্ত্রে প্রত্যাবর্তনের প্রায় দুই দশক বার্ষিক জরিপে রাজনীতির গতিপ্রকৃতির চমৎকার প্রতিফলন দেখা যেত। কিন্তু গণতন্ত্রের ক্ষয়সাধনের সঙ্গে সঙ্গে সেই চর্চা প্রায় বন্ধ হয়ে গেছে। ব্যবসায়িক প্রয়োজন ছাড়া অন্য কোনো বিষয়ে জরিপ করতে গেলে সরকারের সায় আছে কিনা সেটা দেখা হয়, নইলে পেশাদার বিশেষজ্ঞরা বা তাঁদের প্রতিষ্ঠানগুলো ওই দায়িত্ব নিতে চান না। কথা বলার ভয়ের মতো মতামত জানতে চাওয়াতেও এক ধরনের ভয়ের আসর পড়েছে। গণতন্ত্র প্রসারে কাজ করা যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের বেসরকারি প্রতিষ্ঠান ইন্টারন্যাশনাল রিপাবলিকান ইনস্টিটিউট, আইআরআই এ ক্ষেত্রে ব্যতিক্রম। তারা এখনো মাঝে মধ্যে স্পর্শকাতর রাজন

ভিসা নিষেধাজ্ঞা গুরুতর, সাংবাদিক নির্যাতন কী

একই দিনের দুটি সংবাদ শিরোনাম, ’৯ মাসে ২১৭ সাংবাদিক নির্যাতন ও হয়রানির শিকার: আইন ও সালিশ কেন্দ্র’ এবং ’পিটার হাসের বক্তব্য স্বাধীন সাংবাদিকতার ওপর চাপ, সমাবেশে সাংবাদিকনেতারা’। দুটো খবরই সাংবাদিকতা এবং সংবাদমাধ্যমের স্বাধীনতার বিষয়ে। তবে একটি খবর, যাতে আছে সেই সব সাংবাদিকদের কথা, যাঁরা পেশাগত দায়িত্ব পালনের জন্য আঘাতপ্রাপ্ত হয়ে শারীরিক ক্ষতি অথবা গ্রেপ্তার ও মামলার কারণে হয়রানির শিকার হয়েছেন; আর অন্যটিতে ভবিষ্যতে কোনো গণমাধ্যমকর্মী যুক্তরাষ্ট্র যেতে চাইলে ভিসা না পাওয়ার কারণে তিনি বা তাঁর যে সম্ভাব্য ক্ষতি হতে পারে, তা নিয়ে আশঙ্কা। সাংবাদিকদের নিপীড়ন–নির্যাতন ও হয়রানির বিষয়ে গবেষণার কাজ ও তা প্রকাশের দায়িত্ব পালন করেছে একটি মানবাধিকার সংগঠন। অন্যদিকে, যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের ভিসার দুশ্চিন্তায় প্রতিবাদী হয়েছেন সাংবাদিকদের অপেক্ষাকৃত নতুন একটি প্লাটফর্ম জাস্টিস ফর জার্নালিস্ট।  বেসরকারি মানবাধিকার সংগঠনগুলোর নিয়মিত কাজের একটি হচ্ছে বিভিন্ন নিপীড়ন–নির্যাতন ও হয়রানির মত অধিকার লংঘনের তথ্য সংগ্রহ করা এবং তারই অংশ হিসাবে অন্যতম ঝুঁকিপূর্ণ পেশা সাংবাদিকতার ওপর তাদের আলাদা মনোযোগ। তাদের প্রকাশিত হিসাব