সরাসরি প্রধান সামগ্রীতে চলে যান

A Nobel boost for fearless and independent journalism

Maria Ressa of the Philippines and Dmitry Muratov of Russia have won the Nobel Peace Prize for their relentless struggle to protect freedom of expression. Announcing the award, Norwegian Nobel Committee Chair Berit Reiss-Andersen said the duo were receiving the prize for their courageous fight for freedom of expression in the Philippines and Russia. "The committee considered Ressa and Muratov to be representatives of all journalists who stand up for this ideal in a world in which democracy and freedom of the press face increasingly adverse conditions," she added. The recognition of the struggle for freedom of expression and independent journalism in Andersen's speech is also a source of joy and inspiration for us, because we, too, are part of that long struggle.
The Nobel Committee, in its announcement, noted that "free, independent and fact-based journalism serves to protect against abuse of power, lies and war propaganda." Justifying its awarding decision, it said, "The committee is convinced that freedom of expression and freedom of information help to ensure an informed public. These rights are crucial prerequisites for democracy and protect against war and conflict."
In addition to independent journalism, the issues that have inevitably surfaced with the awards of Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov are no less important. First, both the countries of the award-winning duo have been under authoritarian rule for quite some time, and there have been reports of serious violations of basic human rights—including violence, illegal detentions, enforced disappearances, and killings. In the case of the Philippines, the committee cited the unusually high death toll of President Rodrigo Duterte's anti-drug campaign as "the equivalent of a war against the country's own people," and called Maria Ressa a "fearless defender" of the freedom of expression. Ressa and the investigative online portal she co-founded, the Rappler, have also documented how social media is being used to spread fake news, harass opponents, and manipulate public discourse.
Similarly, in Russia, Dmitry Muratov, in his newspaper Novaya Gazeta, highlighted corruption, police violence, illegal arrests, electoral fraud, and the Russian military's troll factories for harassing and intimidating opponents via social media. Due to these works, the newspaper has been subjected to various forms of harassment, threats, and violence. Since the newspaper's inception, six of its journalists have been killed, including Anna Politkovskaya, who was killed for writing about the Chechen war. Despite all the violence and threats, Dmitry Muratov has allowed his journalists to practise independent and objective journalism.
A few hours after the winners were named, I heard Muratov's friend Mikhail Zygar, editor of the only independent TV channel in Russia, TV Rain, telling BBC Radio 4 that his friend had told him that the Nobel Peace Prize had actually been won by six of his slain colleagues. On Saturday, journalist-novelist Mashiul Alam shared a picture of Muratov's quote printed in the Novaya Gazeta, which reads, "Igor Domnikov, Yuri Shchekochikhin, Anna Politkovskaya, Stanislav Markelov, Anastasia Baburova, Natasha Estemirova—are the people who won (the) Nobel prize."
In the history of the Nobel Peace Prize, the only other journalist who received this award was Carl von Ossietzky, and it was 86 years ago. That, too, was amid the rise of Nazism. And the awarding speech given by the then Nobel Committee Chairman Frederik Stang showed greater emphasis on his pacifist role than on his journalism. The German journalist was a former soldier, and war transformed him into a pacifist who became the secretary of the German Peace Society. In that sense, Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov have won the award for the first time for fighting for press freedom, and through that strengthening democracy and building peace.
There is no doubt that there are transnational organisations working for the protection and promotion of journalism, and journalists are feeling enormous pride for this award due to professional fraternity. It also rejuvenates all of us who are working in the news media, as reflected in the statement issued by the International Press Institute (IPI), which said the award was a source of encouragement to journalism. Another organisation named Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said, "They represent all those who work with courage and determination for news and information that is reliable, and freely and independently reported, in a world in which democracy and press freedom are increasingly undermined by the spread of fake news and hate speech." The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), a New York-based organisation, said the award came at a time when journalists are facing unprecedented attacks, digital surveillance, and a decline of public trust in journalism. CPJ Executive Director Joel Simon said Ressa and Muratov symbolised the freedom of the press and why it was needed. They have continued to defy censorship and harassment in the face of personal threats, and have led others to do the same. And their reactions following the awards certainly indicate that they will continue to lead the struggle for press freedom beyond borders by setting examples.
The Philippines and Russia are at the forefront of countries where journalists have been killed with impunity. Statistics compiled by the CPJ shows that since 1992, a total of 87 journalists have been killed in the Philippines, and 58 in Russia. During the same period, the number of journalists killed worldwide was 1,416. The same CPJ statistics named 23 journalists killed in Bangladesh during the same period. However, our ranking in the World Press Freedom Index, prepared by RSF in conjunction with Unesco, is lower than that of the Philippines and Russia: out of 180 countries, our position is 152, while Russia stands at 150 and the Philippines at 138. The global think tanks (including Freedom House) that survey the state of democracy and human rights regrettably portray us poorly, too.
In 2018, the Time Magazine named a few journalists in "The Guardians and the War on Truth" as part of its annual naming of the Person of the Year. Among them were the murdered Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, Maria Ressa of the Philippines, Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe of Myanmar, and Shahidul Alam of Bangladesh. There are many more like Shahidul Alam who have been victims of harassment, intimidation, and torture. Enforced disappearances for some period, arbitrary detentions, and harassment of journalists under the Digital Security Act (DSA) are on the rise. There is an unending struggle to defy invisible and unofficial prohibitions and censors, ignoring the fear of threats and harassment.
Maria Ressa received the Nobel Peace Prize with Dmitry Muratov for persistent defiance of all forms of censorship as editors. It remains to be seen how much our editors and news rooms are inspired and enlivened by the recognition of the courage in journalism.
(Published on October 11, 2021 in the Daily Star.)

মন্তব্যসমূহ

এই ব্লগটি থেকে জনপ্রিয় পোস্টগুলি

Bangladesh is vexed by and wary of Modi’s unstinting support to Sheikh Hasina

In the run-up to Bangladesh’s general election in January 2014, New Delhi took the unusual step of sending a top diplomat from its external affairs ministry to Dhaka to persuade General Hussain Muhammaed Ershad, the country’s former military ruler, to participate in the polls. Big questions had been raised over the fairness of the election. The incumbent government was led by Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League, and the leader of the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) had been placed under virtual house arrest, with police and roadblocks around her house in Dhaka. The BNP and other opposition parties were threatening to boycott the election. Ershad, the head of the Jatiya Party, was perceived as a potential kingmaker, able to bring to power whichever of Bangladesh’s two main parties he supported, but he was also threatening to withdraw from the election.  After a decade of Modi’s reign in India, people in Bangladesh are angry at their government cosying up to a Hindutva regime ...

অরাজনৈতিক আন্দোলনের করুণ রাজনৈতিক মূল্য

কোটা সংস্কারের দাবিতে সাধারণ ছাত্র–ছাত্রীদের আন্দোলনে  কদিন ধরে যা ঘটে চলেছে, তা যেমন বেদনাদায়ক, তেমনই নিন্দনীয় ও ক্ষোভের কারণ। আন্দোলনকারী শিক্ষার্থীদের শিক্ষা দিতে ক্ষমতাসীন সরকারের সমর্থক এবং আইনশৃঙ্খলা রক্ষাবাহিনীর হাতে একইদিনে দেশের তিন জায়গায় ছয়জনের প্রাণহানির ঘটনা স্বাধীন বাংলাদেশে বিরল।  এবার আরও যেসব ঘটনা আমাদের স্তম্ভিত করেছে, অভিভাবকদের চোখ অশ্রুসিক্ত করেছে, এসব মৃত্যুর পরও সরকারের রাজনৈতিক দম্ভ বজায় রাখার চেষ্টা, যা আরও প্রাণহানির কারণ হয়েছে। ছয়জন তরুণের প্রাণ বিসর্জনের পরও কোটা সংস্কারের দাবিতে সরকার ”নীতিগতভাবে একমত” – একথাটি বলে  আলোচনায় না ডেকে সময়ক্ষেপণ করেছে। আইনমন্ত্রী কথাটি যখন বললেন, তার আগেই আরও জীবন গেল, শত শত মানুষ আহত হলো, দেশের সম্পদ নষ্ট হলো। রাজনৈতিক গরিমা ছাড়া এর আর কোনো কারণ আছে কি? ছাত্রলীগ পরিচয়ে অন্ত্রধারীদের তান্ডব, পুলিশের চরম নিষ্ঠুরতা এবং ঢাকা বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়সহ বিভিন্ন প্রতিষ্ঠানে ছাত্রীদের গড়পরতা মারধর ও লাঞ্চিত করার যে দৃশ্যগুলো গণমাধ্যমে প্রকাশ পেয়েছে, তা কোনো অভিভাবকের পক্ষেই ভোলা সম্ভব নয়। এসব ঘটনার বিবরণ উদ্ধৃত না করে শুধু নিষ্ঠুর ...

আনুপাতিক প্রতিনিধিত্বে স্বৈরশাসকের ফেরা সহজ

  গণতন্ত্রে উত্তরণে ব্যর্থতা ও স্বৈরতন্ত্রের নিকৃষ্টতম রুপ প্রত্যক্ষ করার পর অর্ন্তবর্তী সরকারের মেয়াদকালে যে সব বিষয়ে সংস্কারের আলোপ চলছে, তার মধ্যে অন্যতম হচ্ছে নির্বাচনব্যবস্থা। এরশাদের সামরিক স্বৈরাচারের পতনের পর নির্বাচনকে গণতন্ত্র চর্চার মাধ্যম হিসাবে যেভাবে প্রতিষ্ঠার কথা ছিল, তা থেকে প্রধান দুই দলই বিচ্যূত হয়েছিল। পরিণতিতে নির্বাচন শুধু ক্ষমতা দখলের হিংসাত্মক খেলায় পরিণত হয় এবং শেষ পর্যন্ত শেখ হাসিনার আওয়ামী লীগ সাধারণ মানুষের ভোটের অধিকার হরণ করে নির্বাচনকে নানা রকম প্রহসনে পরিণত করে।  এই সমস্যার এক অতি সরলীকৃত সমাধান হিসাবে বলা হচ্ছে, দ্বিদলীয় রাজনীতির বৃত্ত থেকে বেরিয়ে দেশে সত্যিকার বহুদলীয় গণতন্ত্র প্রতিষ্ঠা করতে হবে। আর বহুদলীয় গণতন্ত্রের জন্য নির্বাচনব্যবস্থায় আনুপাতিক প্রতিনিধিত্বের ধারণাকে একমাত্র বা চূড়ান্ত সমাধান হিসাবে তুলে ধরা হচ্ছে।  সংখ্যানুপাতিক বা আনুপাতিক প্রতিনিধিত্ব পদ্ধতির নির্বাচনে একটি দল যত শতাংশ ভোট পাবে, সে অনুপাতে তারা সংসদের আসন পাবে। এ আনুপাতিক পদ্ধতিতে প্রার্থীদের নাম দল আগাম ঘোষণা করতেও পারে, আবার না–ও পারে। নাম প্রকাশ করা হলে সেটা হব...