সরাসরি প্রধান সামগ্রীতে চলে যান

Mizanur’s unacknowledged detention

 Well-known civic rights activist Mizanur Rahman’s narration of his harrowing experience of being picked-up by police and tortured under custody, published in this newspaper’s online version on June 15, gives us some disturbing snapshots of unlawful actions of our law enforcement agencies. As a keen follower of developments related to human rights, I am reminded of the term used by the Committee on Torture (CAT) of the United nations for these kind of arbitrary and unlawful abductions by the members of law enforcing agencies. It's called “unacknowledged detentions.” Though Mizanur’s four-and-a-half hours-long unacknowledged detention came to an end to the relief of his family, the pains and psychological distress he suffered would no doubt stay with him forever. 


Is this unacknowledged detention of Mizanur an exception or deviation in policing practices? Unfortunately, recent trends suggest it has become a preferred tactic to bypass the mandatory legal requirement of producing the suspect before a magistrate within 24 hours. People disappear like characters of a fictional thriller and, if luck favours, they reappear, shown arrested just hours before from some strange place and produced before a court with a petition for remand. The UNCAT, in its concluding observation published on August 26, 2019 said, “The Committee is seriously concerned at numerous, consistent reports that the State

party’s officials have arbitrarily deprived persons of their liberty, subsequently killed many of  them  and  failed  to  disclose  their  whereabouts  or  fate.  Such  conduct  is  defined  in international  human  rights  law  as  enforced  disappearance,  whether  or  not  the  victim  is killed or reappears later.”


In Mizanur’s case, when police picked him up from Bikrampur Plaza, he was misled into believing that it would be just a normal chat with the Deputy Commissioner. But soon he realised that something was not right and managed to inform his daughter. Soon afterwards, he was surrounded by several other police personnel and huddled into a car. In the car, they started misbehaving with him and snatched away his mobile phone. While his family members contacted the local police station, Shyampur Thana, law enforcement members  expressed their ignorance about his detention. Though, at that time, he was either in their custody or was just being handed over to the Detective Branch (DB).  


Unlike other victims of unacknowledged detention, Mizanur gave a vivid description of the demeaning behaviour he was subjected to by a senior officer at the Shyampur police station and physical torture he had to endure there. In his words, "At one point, the female officer ordered that I be beaten up. A policeman was standing there with a stick. Once ordered, he beat me hard several times," He added, "I have so far fought a lot to live with self-respect. Being beaten like this was unacceptable to me. Yes, I have been beaten up before on the road while protesting some cause. But being beaten up like this just for saying something really hurt my self-respect. I could hardly speak. I never felt so helpless. I was also enraged by this," he said. He was not allowed to drink any water and was kept standing all the time (about an hour) at the police station. He was threatened with possible arrest of his wife and daughters as they too sometimes stood by him during civic protests.  


Afterwards, Mizanur along with another arrestee were handcuffed, blindfolded and taken in a car for DB headquarters. His blindfold was only removed after he was taken to a high official's office there. But, there too, he was threatened he could be falsely implicated in cases such as  illegal possession of yaba. Later, after another three hours of mental agony, his family was called in and he was finally let go, most likely as a result of the alarm raised by other social activists and constant enquiries from the media. 


Many of us, including his family had felt relieved that he was lucky enough to have been found alive and freed, unlike many other victims of enforced or involuntary disappearances. Thereby, not many voices have sought accountability of the officials responsible for his unlawful abduction or unacknowledged detention and torture under custody. Mizanur’s detention was the precise kind that was unacknowledged, as there won’t be any official records of police ever picking him up without a warrant, interrogating without presence of his lawyer, subjecting him to dehumanising or cruel behaviour and beating under custody, keeping him blindfolded and hand-cuffed. All these acts are defined as torture in our law. 


It all happened despite the fact Mizanur was not a suspect for any criminal acts or named in any cases anywhere in the country. He is, however, famous for his unique protests for demanding safe drinking water from the supplying authority Dhaka Wasa. He is also known to have taken part in other civic protests and expressed opinions critical of the government and state entities including police for corruption and irregularities. 


What Mizanur encountered since he was picked up from the Bikrampur Plaza till his release are punishable offences under our own law, the Torture and Custodial Death (Prevention) Act, 2013. There are further stipulations by the Supreme Court in implementing the Act due to reported allegations of such violence, particularly in the context of custodial situations where law enforcement agencies seek to obtain confessional statements from the arrestees following arrest or detention. The UNCAT, too, in its final observation, recommended that the government should “[u]nambiguously affirm at the highest level — that law enforcement authorities   must immediately cease engaging in the practice of unacknowledged detention.” The Supreme Court’s guidelines were issued in 2016, three years before UNCAT’s recommendations. 


We need an end to unacknowledged detention and custodial torture. And, it should begin with an independent investigation into Mizanur’s unacknowledged detention. Without accountability of the perpetrators of such unlawful brutality and torture,they won’t end.


(Published in the Daily Star on June 21,2022.)


মন্তব্যসমূহ

এই ব্লগটি থেকে জনপ্রিয় পোস্টগুলি

Bangladesh is vexed by and wary of Modi’s unstinting support to Sheikh Hasina

In the run-up to Bangladesh’s general election in January 2014, New Delhi took the unusual step of sending a top diplomat from its external affairs ministry to Dhaka to persuade General Hussain Muhammaed Ershad, the country’s former military ruler, to participate in the polls. Big questions had been raised over the fairness of the election. The incumbent government was led by Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League, and the leader of the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) had been placed under virtual house arrest, with police and roadblocks around her house in Dhaka. The BNP and other opposition parties were threatening to boycott the election. Ershad, the head of the Jatiya Party, was perceived as a potential kingmaker, able to bring to power whichever of Bangladesh’s two main parties he supported, but he was also threatening to withdraw from the election.  After a decade of Modi’s reign in India, people in Bangladesh are angry at their government cosying up to a Hindutva regime in N

একটি জরিপ, নৈরাশ্য ও তত্ত্বাবধায়ক সরকারের প্রশ্ন

উন্নত গণতন্ত্রে সরকার , সরকারপ্রধান, ক্ষমতাসীন ও বিরোধী দল এবং বিভিন্ন বিতর্কিত ইস্যুতে প্রায়ই জনমত জরিপ করে বিভিন্ন প্রতিষ্ঠান। কখনো বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়, কখনো সংবাদমাধ্যম, আবার কখনো বেসরকারি বিভিন্ন প্রতিষ্ঠান এসব জরিপ করায়। বেশ কিছু পেশাদার জরিপকারী প্রতিষ্ঠানও আছে, যারা শুধু জরিপের কাজ করে। এসব জরিপ আমাদের গণমাধ্যমগুলোর অনলাইন ভোটের মতো নয়, যা অধিকাংশ ক্ষেত্রেই শুধু সেই ওয়েবসাইটের নিয়মিত ব্যবহারকারীদের মতামত ছাড়া আর কিছুই নয়। আমাদের দেশে গণতন্ত্রে প্রত্যাবর্তনের প্রায় দুই দশক বার্ষিক জরিপে রাজনীতির গতিপ্রকৃতির চমৎকার প্রতিফলন দেখা যেত। কিন্তু গণতন্ত্রের ক্ষয়সাধনের সঙ্গে সঙ্গে সেই চর্চা প্রায় বন্ধ হয়ে গেছে। ব্যবসায়িক প্রয়োজন ছাড়া অন্য কোনো বিষয়ে জরিপ করতে গেলে সরকারের সায় আছে কিনা সেটা দেখা হয়, নইলে পেশাদার বিশেষজ্ঞরা বা তাঁদের প্রতিষ্ঠানগুলো ওই দায়িত্ব নিতে চান না। কথা বলার ভয়ের মতো মতামত জানতে চাওয়াতেও এক ধরনের ভয়ের আসর পড়েছে। গণতন্ত্র প্রসারে কাজ করা যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের বেসরকারি প্রতিষ্ঠান ইন্টারন্যাশনাল রিপাবলিকান ইনস্টিটিউট, আইআরআই এ ক্ষেত্রে ব্যতিক্রম। তারা এখনো মাঝে মধ্যে স্পর্শকাতর রাজন

ভিসা নিষেধাজ্ঞা গুরুতর, সাংবাদিক নির্যাতন কী

একই দিনের দুটি সংবাদ শিরোনাম, ’৯ মাসে ২১৭ সাংবাদিক নির্যাতন ও হয়রানির শিকার: আইন ও সালিশ কেন্দ্র’ এবং ’পিটার হাসের বক্তব্য স্বাধীন সাংবাদিকতার ওপর চাপ, সমাবেশে সাংবাদিকনেতারা’। দুটো খবরই সাংবাদিকতা এবং সংবাদমাধ্যমের স্বাধীনতার বিষয়ে। তবে একটি খবর, যাতে আছে সেই সব সাংবাদিকদের কথা, যাঁরা পেশাগত দায়িত্ব পালনের জন্য আঘাতপ্রাপ্ত হয়ে শারীরিক ক্ষতি অথবা গ্রেপ্তার ও মামলার কারণে হয়রানির শিকার হয়েছেন; আর অন্যটিতে ভবিষ্যতে কোনো গণমাধ্যমকর্মী যুক্তরাষ্ট্র যেতে চাইলে ভিসা না পাওয়ার কারণে তিনি বা তাঁর যে সম্ভাব্য ক্ষতি হতে পারে, তা নিয়ে আশঙ্কা। সাংবাদিকদের নিপীড়ন–নির্যাতন ও হয়রানির বিষয়ে গবেষণার কাজ ও তা প্রকাশের দায়িত্ব পালন করেছে একটি মানবাধিকার সংগঠন। অন্যদিকে, যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের ভিসার দুশ্চিন্তায় প্রতিবাদী হয়েছেন সাংবাদিকদের অপেক্ষাকৃত নতুন একটি প্লাটফর্ম জাস্টিস ফর জার্নালিস্ট।  বেসরকারি মানবাধিকার সংগঠনগুলোর নিয়মিত কাজের একটি হচ্ছে বিভিন্ন নিপীড়ন–নির্যাতন ও হয়রানির মত অধিকার লংঘনের তথ্য সংগ্রহ করা এবং তারই অংশ হিসাবে অন্যতম ঝুঁকিপূর্ণ পেশা সাংবাদিকতার ওপর তাদের আলাদা মনোযোগ। তাদের প্রকাশিত হিসাব